Crazy Politics

Video: Hitler and Gun Control Proponents – What’s the Connection?

Video: Hitler and Gun Control Proponents - What's the Connection?
This video about Hitler and gun control is a humorous look at the reaction of the big government supporters on recent failures to pass more unnecessary gun control over honest law abiding citizens. Keep in mind that it actually was Hitler and Stalin who pioneered the art of disarming citizens prior to instituting totalitarian government control over their citizens. What is not humorous is that these two are collectively responsible for the deaths of at least 20 million people. What was the goal of the gun control measures instituted by Hitler and Stalin? It was to ensure that the citizens were defenseless and entirely dependent on the government to protect them. What happened to people when the government turned against them? An armed populace inhibits governments from being oppressive because the leaders know they must govern by the consent of the governed. Gun control removes all inhibition from because the state has a complete monopoly on force.

The Full Story From Fox News on the Timeline of the Administration’s Botched Benghazi Cover Up

The Full Story From Fox News on the Timeline of the Administration's Botched Benghazi Cover Up
Published on Oct 20, 2012 by Daniel Frawley In a special report, Bret Baier shows the full timeline of what happened before, during, and after the Benghazi terrorist attack. The report suggests not only a White House cover-up, but also a serious miscalculation when it comes to multiple denied requests for additional security prior to the 9/11/2012 attack at the Benghazi compound. My View Obama, in order to help win his election, needs to say not only that bin laden is dead and that it was all because of him but also that al-Qaeda is on a path to be defeated. This terrorist attack doesn't help the case he is trying to make when attempting to champion his foreign policy. While the events in the video have been unfolding, he has been attempting to down play the war on terrorism itself, suggesting not only that he is winning it but also trying to show contrast between himself and Bush when it comes to foreign policy. Obama doesn't want to admit that during his presidency (under his watch) there has been a successful terrorist attack against this country. He doesn't want to admit that not only did his administration (the state department) deny multiple request for additional security, but they reduced security before the attacks as well. they knew it was a terrorist attack within 24 hours yet told the public something much different, that it was all because of a YouTube video that was published months before and somehow became a big deal coincidentally on 9/11. in addition, the FBI took weeks to investigate, letting the crime scene become completely disrupted. they said it was because it was too dangerous for the FBI agents yet unarmed CNN reporters were in there 3 days after the attack occurred, recovering Stevens' diary that stated he thought he was on a terrorist hit list. All this happening after multiple terrorist attacks in Libya against other countries embassies (such as the UK). If the president wasn't so busy campaigning all over the country and going on talk shows, or if he wasn't in denial that there is still a war on terrorism, perhaps he would have done what should have been obvious to do which was beef up security before 9/11 rather than after. I guess this is what happens in an election year, as that appears to be more important than the four innocent lives lost including our ambassador Christopher Stevens (RIP).

President Obama Refuses to Confirm or Deny that He Gave Order to Stand Down Support to Our Special Operations Forces in Libya

President Obama Refuses to Confirm or Deny that He Gave Order to Stand Down Support to Our Special Operations Forces in Libya
President Obama declined to answer directly whether a CIA annex was denied urgent requests for military assistance during the deadly attacks last month on U.S. outposts in Libya. The president did not give a yes-or-no answer Friday when asked pointedly whether the Americans under attack in Benghazi, Libya, were denied requests for help during the attack. Fox News has also learned that a request from the CIA annex for backup was later denied. “The election has nothing to do with the four brave Americans getting killed and us wanting to find out exactly what happened,” the president said in TV interview with an NBC affiliate in Colorado. When asked again, Obama said, “The minute I found out what was going on, I gave three very clear directives -- Number 1, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.” The first attack occurred at the American consulate in Benghazi, killing U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and U.S. diplomat Sean Smith. Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team that was at the CIA annex about a mile from the consulate when it came under attack. Upon hearing shots fired, team members asked higher-ups at the annex if they could go the consulate. However, they were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. Woods and at least two others ignored those orders and went to the consulate, evacuating survivors and Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight. At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. Woods and fellow former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty were killed at the annex by a mortar shell at 4 a.m. The CIA and Defense Department have denied claims about requests for support being rejected. "The agency reacted quickly to aid our colleagues during that terrible evening in Benghazi," said CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood. "Moreover, no one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need. Claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate.” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said there was not a clear enough picture of what was occurring on the ground in Benghazi to send help. "There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here," he said Thursday. "But the basic principle here ... is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on." Obama also said in the TV interview, as he said previously said, the administration is going to “investigate what happened to make sure it never happens again” and find out who was involved in the attack so they can be brought to justice. “I guarantee you that everybody in the State Department, our military, CIA, you name it, have a No.1 priority making sure that people are safe. These are our folks. And we're going to find out exactly what happened but what we're also going to do is make sure that we are identify those who carried out these terrible attacks,” the president said.

News Analysis of the Ongoing Obama Administration Cover-Up Regarding the Killing of Ambassador Chris Stevens

News Analysis of the Ongoing Obama Administration Cover-Up Regarding the Killing of Ambassador Chris Stevens
In a special report, Bret Baier shows the full timeline of what happened before, during, and after the Benghazi terrorist attack. The report suggests not only a White House cover-up, but also a serious miscalculation when it comes to denied requests for additional security prior to the 9/11/2012 attack at the Benghazi compound. The Poster of this Video, Daniel Frawley Writes his opinion: "Obama, in order to help win his election, needs to say not only that bin laden is dead and that it was all because of him but also that al-Qaeda is on a path to be defeated. This terrorist attack doesn't help the case he is trying to make when attempting to champion his foreign policy. While the events in the video have been unfolding, he has been attempting to down play the war on terrorism itself, suggesting not only that he is winning it but also trying to show contrast between himself and Bush when it comes to foreign policy. Obama doesn't want to admit that during his presidency (under his watch) there has been a successful terrorist attack against this country. He doesn't want to admit that not only did his administration (the state department) deny the request for additional security, but they reduced security before the attacks as well. they knew it was a terrorist attack within 24 hours yet told the public something much different, that it was all because of a YouTube video that was published months before and somehow became a big deal coincidentally on 9/11. in addition, the FBI took weeks to investigate, letting the crime scene become completely disrupted. they said it was because it was too dangerous for the FBI agents yet unarmed CNN reporters were in there 3 days after the attack occurred, recovering Stevens' diary that stated he thought he was on a terrorist hit list. All this happening after multiple terrorist attacks in Libya against other countries embassies (such as the UK). If the president wasn't so busy campaigning all over the country and going on talk shows, or if he wasn't in denial that there is still a war on terrorism, perhaps he would have done what should have been obvious to do which was beef up security before 9/11 rather than after. I guess this is what happens in an election year, as that appears to be more important than the four innocent lives lost including our ambassador Christopher Stevens (RIP)."

President Obama Will Have More Flexibility After His Last Election – Make Him a Private Citizen So He Can Improve His Golf Game Instead of Weakening Our National Security!

President Obama Will Have More Flexibility After His Last Election - Make Him a Private Citizen So He Can Improve His Golf Game Instead of Weakening Our National Security!
President Obama shows a rare spot of honesty when speaking to Russian President Medevedev “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space,” Mr. Obama could be heard saying to Mr. Medvedev, according a reporter from ABC News, who was traveling with the president. “Yeah, I understand,” the departing Russian president said. “I understand your message about space. Space for you ... .” Mr. Obama then elaborated in a portion of the exchange picked up by the cameras: “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” Mr. Medvedev said, referring to Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin, who just won an election to succeed Mr. Medvedev. We should give President Obama the flexibility to work on his golf game and his memoirs by sending him back to private life on November 6th. We, the American People cannot afford to give President Obama more flexibility to trade away our national security by weaking our missile defenses.

A Warning About Socialism From Someone Who Knows Something About Socialism

A Warning About Socialism From Someone Who Knows Something About Socialism
Billionaire Thomas Peterffy is perhaps best known as the founder of electronic stock trading firm Interactive Brokers, but the Hungarian-born American entrepreneur also grew up in the shadow of socialism and is not excited about what he sees happening here in the U.S. On Wednesday he began airing his own, privately financed one-minute ad addressing his concerns about the U.S. election and urging viewers to vote Republican. “I grew up in a socialist country and I have seen what that does to people,” Peterffy, who is believed to be worth as much as $5 billion, says in the ad. “There is no hope, no freedom, no pride in achievement. The nation became poorer and poorer, and that’s what I see happening here.” … “America’s wealth comes from the efforts of people striving for success. Take away their incentive with badmouthing success and you take away the wealth that helps us take care of the needy.” According to CNN, Peterffy’s spots will run through Election Day on November 6 and he’s expecting to spend $5-$10 million total on the ad buy depending how well it performs. Swing states like Ohio, Wisconsin and Colorado will be the focus.

Is He The Most Arrogant President in Recent History? – Does Barack Obama Feel He is Entitled to Rule – What Do You Think?

Is He The Most Arrogant President in Recent History? - Does Barack Obama Feel He is Entitled to Rule - What Do You Think?
Our President has reveled in the trappings of the office. Costly vacations, a casual work schedule that includes more time on the golf course than any President in recent history, and more interest in campaigning than actually performing the duties of President of the United States. This short clip shows highlights from the events that have contributed to his exceptional pride. Look at the decisions he's made very closely and you see that they are all characterized by one common factor: They are made with a view towards protecting him from criticism while gaining favor with his radical electoral base. Is this the man you would choose to govern this country for another term when he will be unrestrained from the necessity to hide his radical leanings to be reelected? There is plenty of evidence that the second term of this President's administration will be characterized by a complete disregard for our great constitution, based on the many questionable actions he has taken in his first term.

If Not a Product of His Past, Just Who Is President Barack Obama?

If Not a Product of His Past, Just Who Is President Barack Obama?
Just a simple review: Who Is Barack Obama? Every bit of information in this video is well documented, there is nothing in it that has not been extensively researched yet most of the information in this tape is virtually ignored by the media as if it is simply not relevant. The media is responsible for creating a fraudulent presidency by actively suppressing the distribution of any negative information about candidate Obama before the 2008 election. Since the election they have continued to surpress information about the policies and legislation introduced by President Obama and the democrats in congress. If you can view this short video and not see the connection between President Obama's past and the decisions and policies that he has championed during his presidency then you are not thinking!

Obama Administration Caught in Lies about Al Queda Attack On Libyan Ambassador

Obama Administration Caught in Lies about Al Queda Attack On Libyan Ambassador
It is pretty clear that the Obama administration was negligent in providing security for Ambassador Chris Stevens. They have engaged in a deliberate misinformation campaign to try and blame his death on a spontaneous demonstration despite clear indications that it was a carefully planned attack with sophisticated fire support and planning. Members of the intelligence community stated that they knew within 24 hours that this attack was planned and executed by terrorist forces and was clearly not a mob action. Yet the administration sent out their officials with talking points to blame the attack on a amateur film posted on You Tube that was seen by very few people in the middle east. It is clear that the administration was trying to deflect attention to a serious lapse in security despite many warnings and indications that violence was likely on the 9-11 anniversary.

10 Unsavory Presidential Appointees – Want to Know What the President’s Real Values Are?

10 Unsavory Presidential Appointees - Want to Know What the President's Real Values Are?
We judge a man by his friends. We judge a president by his appointees. What is your judgment on President Obama for selecting these individuals to have positions of power and influence in our government? 10. Carol Browner - Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change 9. Rosa Brooks - Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy 8. Mark Lloyd - Chief Diversity Officer at the Federal Communications Commission 7. Kevin Jennings - Assistant Deputy heading the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools at the U.S. Department of Education 6. Dawn Johnsen - Obama nominated her to serve as assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel in the United States Department of Justice 5. David Hamilton - Obama nominated him to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 4. Harold Koh - Legal Adviser of the Department of State 3. Samantha Power - National Security Council 2. Cass Sunstein - Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 1. John Holdren - Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Co-Chair of the Presidents Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST)

The Liberal World View Ignores Reality In Favor of Hollywood-Like Illusions About Life

The Liberal World View Ignores Reality In Favor of Hollywood-Like Illusions About Life
"Men sleep peaceably in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." (George Orwell) Liberals consider themselves to be great thinkers and intellectuals but blind devotion to their ideology causes them to believe things that are simply unrealistic. The real world is governed by the threat of aggressive use of force. As George Orwell simply stated, it is the threat of force that maintains our freedom from despots and dictators. Barack Obama believed that his understanding of muslims and his good intentions and conciliatory speeches toward the muslim world would usher in world peace. The producer of this video wrote: "Then-Senator Barack Obama makes the case for an Obama Presidency on November 21, 2007 by saying he is uniquely qualified to bring stability to America's relationships in the Muslim world because he lived in an Islamic country during his youth and his half-sister is Muslim. Its ironic and revealing how narcacistic this man is to think that somehow these people will respect us more just because of him. Say what you want about the George Bush years, at least Al Quiada wasnt raising their flags over our embassies around the region."

More of President Obama’s Radical Friends and Political Appointees – Do these Characters really belong in a Government of, for, and by the People?

More of President Obama's Radical Friends and Political Appointees - Do these Characters really belong in a Government of, for, and by the People?
Obama's closes friends and his political appointees are all radical and far out of the mainstream of American views. It's no coincidence that the people who are making policies in countless areas are committed to radically changing our culture. It seems that not only Obama was connected to Frank Marshall Davis, but the president’s two most trusted friends and advisers Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod, can also trace their political heritage back to Davis and the Chicago Communist Party USA of the 1940s. From The American Spectator: "As readers of this site are aware, I’ve just published a book on Barack Obama’s mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. No president in the long history of this republic has had a mentor like Obama’s. Frank Marshall Davis was a literal — and I mean literal — card-carrying member of Communist Party USA. I publish Davis’s Communist Party number (47544) on the cover of the book, and fill an appendix with declassified FBI documents and Soviet archival material. Those documents reveal a Davis so suspicious that he was placed on the federal government’s Security Index, which meant he could be immediately arrested if war broke out between the United States and USSR. With that sort of pro-Soviet influence throughout his adolescence (1970-79), Barack Obama would have trouble getting a security clearance for an entry-level government job, let alone sit in the Oval Office."

Democrat’s Rampant Cronyism and Political Connections Is a Bad Example to Kids – It’s Time to Give Them A Good One

Democrat's Rampant Cronyism and Political Connections Is a Bad Example to Kids - It's Time to Give Them A Good One
Is cronyism the new ideal for young people. What's A Crony? The editors of the Crony Chronicles write, "In an economically free society, the role of business is to create value for society by producing products and services that their customers consider beneficial. If they do this while using resources wisely, they make a profit, and societal wellbeing is enhanced. Cronyism diverts resources away from the wants and needs of consumers and toward political purposes. Cronyism occurs when an individual or organization colludes with government officials to create unfair legislation and/or regulations which give them forced benefits they could not have otherwise obtained voluntarily. Those benefits come at the expense of consumers, taxpayers, and everyone working hard to compete in the marketplace." Cronyism is natural to Democrats like water is to a fish. The reason for the popularity of cronyism among liberals is that philosophically, they are by nature elitists. Liberals believe God has specially gifted them to know what is best for others, and that if we are left to our own devices we will always make the wrong choices. This is why liberals tend to be statists, they want the individual subjugated to the state because they don't trust individuals to make good choices, unless of course they are liberals like themselves.

When Someone Doesn’t Do the Job You Have to Let Them Go – Clint Eastwood Talks to the Empty Chair –

When Someone Doesn't Do the Job You Have to Let Them Go - Clint Eastwood Talks to the Empty Chair -
(From CBS News) "At the height of the tightly-scripted Republican National Convention, actor Clint Eastwood on Thursday made a "surprise" appearance, delivering a sometimes humorous, other times scathing speech - a convention moment that was ad-libbed, according to the Romney campaign. Eastwood, who was reported to be the night's "mystery guest" earlier in the day, mocked President Obama, hitting the president on, among other things, the country's unemployment problem, Afghanistan and being a lawyer." This is the condensed version of Clint Eastwood's talk at the Republican National Convention. The full version is pretty good, much better than President Clinton's long winded self-congratulatory speech at the Democrat convention! Of course the Hollywood liberals pounced on Eastwood and claimed that he was loosing it. Many of those who've watched the full video feel like he nailed it on the head. Government leaders are employees of the people and should be let go when they fail to deliver the leadership that is needed. We provide this abbreviated version with the advice that you see the whole speech without editing. Enjoy it.

You Didn’t Build That! What did President Obama Mean? The Closer You Look, the Worse it Gets!

You Didn't Build That!  What did President Obama Mean? The Closer You Look, the Worse it Gets!
This video is a fair and accurate analysis of what President Obama said during his controversial "You didn't build that!" speech delivered in Roanoke, Virginia. What did President Obama mean by his comment "You didn't build that!" Many democrats have said that he was misquoted but in reality the language he used was very clear. When you listen to in the full context of his remarks it is actually more offensive than the short sound-bite. In this 9 minute video you will hear the full remarks in context as well as some thoughtful commentary on the significance of what he said and why it is so distasteful to American small business owners and anyone who has put their heart and soul into achieving their dreams. Americans should be offended by the idea that government is an essential element for our success. Every small business owner knows that state, local, and federal governments are the authors and originators of countless obstacles and time wasting requirements that make running a business an incredibly difficult venture. Well, it's gone down very badly with American small business owners, and many are concerned over the continual growth of the Nanny state that will soon guide our every thought and action. Welcome to President Obama's America! You might also want to look at Professor Ken Homa's Blog entry below for a grammatical critique of what the President said. Assuming that words do mean something...

Democrats Deny God and Jerusalem as Capitol of Israel By Voting No 3 Times at the Convention and Booing God

Democrats Deny God and Jerusalem as Capitol of Israel By Voting No 3 Times at the Convention and Booing God
During the Democratic Convention the Democrats Boo God and Jerusalem as the Capitol of Israel. Three voice votes were taken to attempt to ram language into the Democratic Platform but most of the democrats were very unhappy. It clearly sounded like the No votes were louder than the Yes votes. It would appear that over 50% of the democrats at the convention did not want God in their platform and opposed Jerusalem as the capitol of Jerusalem. This is the entire unedited clip from CNN and clearly demonstrates that it was not a vote at all, but a calculated plan to force it upon the democrat delegates. Just the same way the democrats forced the wildly unpopular Health Care bill on the American people. Democrat leaders always know what is best for the people.